Doppler of the liver made simple

The term duplex Doppler can be confusing due to its dual usage. Sometimes, the term is used to refer to color Doppler examinations; at other times, to spectral Doppler examinations. A spectral Doppler examination includes color Doppler US; a color Doppler examination includes gray-scale US (Bmode imaging).

Doppler angle (Θ), which should be less than 60°; and sample volume or “gate” (yellow).

Cardiac phasicity creates a phasic cycle, which is composed of phases as determined by the number of times blood flows in each direction. The baseline (x = 0) separates one direction from another. Moving from left to right along the x-axis corresponds to moving forward in time. Moving away from the baseline vertically along the y-axis in either direction corresponds to increasing velocities. Any given point on the waveform corresponds to a specific velocity. The slope of the curve corresponds to acceleration (ie, a change in velocity per unit time). A bend in the curve, or inflection point, corresponds to a change in acceleration. When these turns are abrupt, they generate audible sounds at Doppler US.

strictly speaking, the term duplex Doppler refers to an examination consisting of two levels (gray-scale and color Doppler US). However, the term is commonly used by referring physicians when ordering an examination with spectral Doppler, which technically would be more accurately termed triplex Doppler. To avoid confusion, it is probably better to use terms that describe the examination more precisely. Such terms include gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler.

Ideally, the sample volume should be placed in the midportion of the lumen, rather than toward the periphery, for optimal estimation of laminar flow. An angle indicator line is subjectively placed parallel to the vessel; however, this placement can introduce error into the final velocity calculation, especially when the Doppler angle (Θ)—the angle between the actual Doppler beam and the Doppler interrogation line—is greater than 60°.

The terms antegrade and retrograde are used to describe flow in this context. The second is to describe flow with respect to the US transducer. In this context, flow is described as moving either toward or away from the transducer. Color Doppler arbitrarily displays blood flow toward the transducer as red and blood flow away from the transducer as blue. At spectral Doppler, blood flow toward the transducer is displayed above the baseline and blood flow away from the transducer is displayed below the baseline.

Antegrade flow may be either toward or away from the transducer, depending on the spatial relationship of the transducer to the vessel; therefore, antegrade flow may be displayed above

or below the baseline, depending on the vessel being interrogated.

Retrograde flow may be seen in severe portal hypertension, in which portal venous flow reverses direction (hepatofugal flow).

Diagrams illustrate the various waveforms. The terms used to describe the degree of waveform undulation empirically describe the velocity and acceleration features of the waveform. Note that pulsatile, phasic, and nonphasic flow waveforms all have phasicity. Pulsatile flow is exaggerated phasicity, which is normally seen in arteries but can also be seen in diseased veins. Nonphasic flow does in fact have a phase (of 1); however, the phase has no velocity variation (nonphasic could be thought of as meaning “nonvariation”). The term aphasic literally means “without phase,” which is the case when there is no flow. . Phasic

is another word for cyclic.

Phasic blood flow has velocity and acceleration fluctuations that are generated by cyclic (phasic)

pressure fluctuations, which are in turn generated by the cardiac cycle (cardiac phasicity).

Differences in interpretations: D.A.M. interprets a phase as a component of the waveform on either side of the baseline; M.M.A.Y. interprets a phase as an inflection.

When phase is defined as a component of phasic flow direction, waveforms may be described in terms of the number of phases. All monophasic waveforms are unidirectional; bidirectional waveforms may be either biphasic, triphasic, or tetraphasic.

Inflection quantification. Schematics illustrate waveforms, which can be characterized on the basis of the number of inflections. Inflections occur in pairs. It is not possible to have an odd number of inflections; otherwise, a cycle would never repeat. Nonetheless, some sonologists (including M.M.A.Y.) may call the waveform on the left monophasic, based on the fact that it has only one flow velocity. M.M.A.Y. calls the waveform in the middle biphasic, based on the number of inflection points (two) per wave.

The presence or absence of phasicity can be qualified with various descriptors: pulsatile flow (arteries), phasic flow (veins), nonphasic flow (diseased veins), and aphasic flow (diseased vessels without flow).

Low-Resistance Arteries (Normal RI = 0.55–0.7)

Internal carotid arteries

Hepatic arteries

Renal arteries

Testicular arteries

illustrate that a high-resistance artery (left) allows less blood flow during end diastole (the trough is lower) than does a low-resistance artery (right). These visual findings are confirmed by calculating an RI. High-resistance arteries normally have RIs over 0.7, whereas low-resistance arteries have RIs ranging from 0.55 to 0.7. The hepatic artery is a low-resistance artery.

In the physiologic state, arteries have the capacity to change their resistance to divert flow toward the organs that need it most. In general, when an organ needs to be “on,” its arteriolar bed relaxes, the waveform takes on low resistance, and the organ is appropriately perfused. When an organ goes to “power save” mode, its arterioles constrict, the waveform switches to high resistance, and flow is diverted to other organs.

Arteries that normally have low resistance in resting (ie, nonexercising) patients include the internal carotid arteries (brain is always on), hepatic arteries (liver is on), renal arteries (kidneys are on), and testicular arteries. The postprandial (nonfasting) mesenteric vessels (superior and inferior mesenteric arteries) also have low resistance.

If the lowest point (trough) of the waveform at end diastole is high, there is relatively more flow during diastole, a finding that indicates a low-resistance vessel. If the trough is low, there is relatively less

flow during diastole, a finding that indicates a high-resistance vessel.

In general, low-resistance arteries normally have an RI of 0.55–0.7. The hepatic artery is a low-resistance vessel.

High-Resistance Arteries (Normal RI >0.7)

External carotid arteries

Extremity arteries (eg, external iliac arteries,

axillary arteries)

Fasting mesenteric arteries (superior and inferior

mesenteric arteries)

1. A high RI is not specific for liver disease;

therefore, it is less meaningful as an isolated finding than is a low RI.

2. An RI that is too high may be the result of

the postprandial state, advanced patient age, or

diffuse distal microvascular disease, which has a

wide variety of causes including chronic liver disease due to cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis.

3. An RI that is too low may be the result of

proximal stenosis or distal vascular shunting

(arteriovenous or arterioportal fistulas), as seen

in severe cirrhosis; trauma (including iatrogenic

injury); or Osler-Weber-Rendu syndrome.

n the proximal aorta (top left), plug flow results in a thin waveform and a clear spectral window (top right). Note the actual windows (yellow) superimposed on the first two spectral windows. In vessels smaller than the aorta, blood flow is laminar. In large and medium-sized vessels (left, second from top), the waveform is thick, but there is still a spectral window (middle right). In small or compressed vessels (left, second from bottom), there is significant spectral broadening, which obscures the spectral window (bottom right). Diseased vessels with turbulent flow (bottom left) also cause spectral broadening (bottom right).

Spectral broadening occurs in small blood vessels, such as the hepatic or vertebral arteries. In general, the smaller the vessel, the more spectral broadening can be expected, since a wider range of velocities is sampled from the center to the periphery of the vessel. Another cause of physiologic spectral broadening is turbulent flow at bifurcations, such as in the carotid arteries.

Diagrams illustrate how normal waveforms can be systematically characterized on the basis of direction (D), phasicity (P), phase quantification number (Q), and inflection quantification (I). Arteries can be further characterized on the basis of their level of resistance (high or low). The femoral artery has truly triphasic flow. Normal hepatic venous flow has historically been called triphasic; in reality, however, it is biphasic with predominantly antegrade flow and four inflection points.

Waveform nomenclature (abnormal waveforms). Diagrams illustrate how abnormal waveforms, like normal waveforms, can be systematically characterized on the basis of direction (D), phasicity(P), phase quantification number (Q), and inflection quantification (I).

Subjective evidence of an upstream stenosis is commonly seen as a tardus-parvus waveform.

This description is based on empirical observations of the peak of the waveform; specifically, it

refers to the late (Latin, tardus, “slow” or “late”) and low (Latin, parvus, “small”) appearance of

the peak.

The effect of stenosis on the contour of spectral waveforms and the measured parameters, such as peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), and RI. Blue = normal vessel and waveform contour, yellow = prestenotic and poststenotic vessels and waveform contours, green = in-stenosis vessel and waveform contour. Note that velocities are increased within a stenotic portion of a vessel, and that the RI is increased when the stenosis is downstream but decreased when the stenosis is upstream. A waveform whose contour is affected by an upstream stenosis is often described as a tardus-parvus waveform.

The term tardus-parvus is most commonly applied in cases of aortic stenosis and renal artery stenosis; however, this finding may be observed in the poststenotic downstream portion of any vascular territory.

Diagram illustrates upstream stenosis (tardus-parvus waveform). Use of the term tardus-parvus requires no measurement or calculation; rather, it is based on subjective observations of the peak of a waveform. When it is apparent that the peak is too late (tardus) and too low (parvus), use of the term is appropriate. This finding occurs only downstream from a stenosis (ie, due to upstream stenosis). It is commonly seen in the setting of renal artery stenosis or aortic stenosis. However, it may also be seen in the setting of hepatic artery stenosis (upstream stenosis). PSV = peak systolic velocity, TTP = time to peak.

Liver Doppler Waveforms

The term waveform signature is often used in liver Doppler US because the waveform of each major vessel is so specific that it can be used to identify the vessel, even when the gray-scale or color Doppler US appearance is ambiguous.

Hepatic arteries

The normal hepatic arterial waveform is the easiest to understand. the normal hepatic arterial waveform may be described as pulsatile.

Its peak height corresponds to peak systolic velocity (V1), and its trough corresponds to enddiastolic velocity (V2). The flow is antegrade throughout the entire cardiac cycle and

is displayed above the baseline. Because the liver requires continuous blood flow, the hepatic artery is a low-resistance vessel, with an expected RI ranging from 0.55 to 0.7. In summary, the hepatic arterial waveform is normally pulsatile with low resistance. Liver disease may manifest in the hepatic artery as abnormally elevated (RI >0.7) or decreased (RI <0.55) resistance.

High resistance is a nonspecific finding that may be seen in the postprandial state, patients of advanced age, and diffuse peripheral microvascular (arteriolar) compression or disease, as seen in chronic hepatocellular disease (including cirrhosis), hepatic venous congestion, cold ischemia

(posttransplantation), and any stage of transplant rejection.

Normal hepatic arterial flow direction and waveform. The direction of flow in any patent hepatic artery is antegrade (left), which corresponds to a waveform above the baseline at spectral Doppler US (right). The hepatic artery is normally a low-resistance vessel, meaning it should have an RI ranging from 0.55 to 0.7.

Schematics show a spectrum of increasing hepatic arterial resistance (bottom to top). The hepatic artery normally has low resistance (RI = 0.55–0.7) (middle). Resistance below this range (bottom) is abnormal. Similarly, any resistance above this range (top) may also be abnormal. High resistance is less specific for disease than is low resistance.

Low hepatic arterial resistance is more specific for disease and has a more limited differential

diagnosis, including conditions associated with proximal arterial narrowing (transplant hepatic

artery stenosis [anastomosis], atherosclerotic disease [celiac or hepatic], arcuate ligament syndrome) and distal (peripheral) vascular shunts (posttraumatic or iatrogenic arteriovenous fistulas, cirrhosis with portal hypertension and associated arteriovenous or arterioportal shunts, Osler-Weber-Rendu syndrome with arteriovenous fistulas). Arterial resistance has been shown to be decreased, normal, or increased in cirrhotic patients.

Causes of Elevated Hepatic Arterial Resistance (RI >0.7)

Pathologic (microvascular compression or disease)

Chronic hepatocellular disease (including cirrhosis)

Hepatic venous congestion

Acute congestion -> diffuse peripheral vasoconstriction

Chronic congestion -> fibrosis with diffuse peripheral compression

(cardiac cirrhosis)

Transplant rejection (any stage)

Any other disease that causes diffuse compression or narrowing of

peripheral arterioles

Physiologic

Postprandial state

Advanced patient age

Causes of Decreased Hepatic Arterial Resistance (RI <0.55)

Proximal arterial narrowing

Transplant stenosis (anastomosis)

Atherosclerotic disease (celiac or hepatic)

Arcuate ligament syndrome (relatively less common than transplant

stenosis or atherosclerotic disease)

Distal (peripheral) vascular shunts (arteriovenous or arterioportal fistulas)

Cirrhosis with portal hypertension

Posttraumatic or iatrogenic causes

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (Osler-Weber-Rendu syndrome)

Diagram illustrates normal hepatic venous flow direction and waveform. The direction of normal flow is predominantly antegrade, which corresponds to a waveform that is mostly below the baseline at spectral Doppler US. The term triphasic, which refers to the a, S, and D inflection points, is commonly used to describe the shape of this waveform; according to D.A.M., however, this term is a misnomer, and the term tetrainflectional is more accurate, since it includes the vwave and avoids inaccurate phase quantification. Normal hepatic venous waveforms may be biphasic (bottom left) or tetraphasic (bottom right).

Hepatic Veins

The hepatic venous waveform, is much more difficult to understand than the hepatic arterial waveform, owing to its many components generated by complex alternating antegrade-retrograde pressure or flow variations, which are in turn created by pressure variations related to the cardiac cycle .

Understanding it requires accepting two pieces of information. First, the bulk of hepatic venous flow is antegrade. Although there are moments of retrograde flow, the majority of blood

flow must be antegrade to get back to the heart. Antegrade flow is away from the liver and toward the heart; thus, it will also be away from the transducer and, therefore, displayed below

the baseline. Second, just as pressure changes in the left ventricle are transmitted to the systemic arteries, pressure changes in the right atrium will be transmitted directly to the hepatic veins.

Anything that increases right atrial pressure (atrial contraction toward end diastole, late systolic atrial filling against a closed tricuspid valve) will cause the wave to slope upward. Anything

that decreases right atrial pressure (downward early systolic atrioventricular septal motion, early diastolic right ventricular filling) will cause the wave to slope downward.

The normal hepatic vein waveform, despite commonly being described as triphasic, has four

components: a retrograde A wave, an antegrade S wave, a transitional V wave (which may be antegrade, retrograde, or neutral), and an antegrade D wave.

Normal triphasic Doppler waveform. Diagram shows the four waves in the normal spectral Doppler waveform. The A wave (blue), which is above the baseline, has a retrograde component of flow toward the liver. The S (red) and D (green) waves are below the baseline with flow antegrade toward the heart. The V wave (yellow) is a transitional wave, which in the normal patient may peak below, at, or above the baseline.

The a wave is the first wave encountered on the waveform. It is generated by increased right

atrial pressure resulting from atrial contraction, which occurs toward end diastole. The a wave

is an upward-pointing wave with a peak that corresponds to maximal retrograde hepatic venous flow. In physiologic states, the peak of the a wave is above the baseline, and the a wave is

wider and taller than the v wave (the other potentially retrograde wave).

Even in pathologic states, the a wave remains wider than the v wave, which represents the best way to initially orient oneself on the waveform. The only time this rule breaks down is in cases of severe tricuspid regurgitation, when the S wave becomes retrograde and merges with the a and v waves to form one large retrograde a-S-v complex.

The S wave is the next wave encountered on the waveform. Its initial downward-sloping

portion is generated by decreasing right atrial pressure, as a result of the “sucking” effect created by the downward motion of the atrioventricular septum as it descends toward the cardiac apex during early to midsystole. Note that the tricuspid valve remains closed. If it were open (tricuspid regurgitation), the result would be pathologic retrograde flow. The S wave corresponds to antegrade hepatic venous flow and is the largest downward-pointing wave in the cycle. The lowest point occurs in midsystole and is the point at which negative pressure is minimally opposed and antegrade velocity is maximal. After this low point, the wave rises again as pressure in the right atrium builds due to ongoing systemic venous return.

The v wave is the third wave encountered on the waveform. The upward-sloping portion

is generated by increasing right atrial pressure resulting from continued systemic venous return against the still-closed tricuspid valve, all of which occurs toward the end of systole. The peak of the wave marks the opening of the tricuspid valve and the transition from systole to diastole. Thereafter, the wave slopes downward because right atrial pressure is relieved during rapid early diastolic right ventricular filling. The position of the peak of the v wave varies from above to below the baseline in normal states. It should be remembered that if the v wave never rises above the baseline, it cannot be called retrograde, since the baseline marks the transition from antegrade to retrograde.

The D wave is the fourth and last wave encountered on the waveform. Its initial downward-sloping portion is generated by decreasing right atrial pressure resulting from rapid early diastolic right ventricular filling. The D wave corresponds to antegrade hepatic venous flow

and is the smaller of the two downward-pointing waves. The lowest point occurs when the antegrade diastolic velocity is maximal. The subsequent rising portion results from increasing right atrial pressure generated by the increasing right ventricular blood volume.It is almost unheard of to describe flow in the hepatic veins as hepatofugal, since the term is reserved for describing the state of pathologic flow in the portal veins. However, it is important to remember that physiologic flow in the hepatic veins is hepatofugal (ie, away from the liver and toward the heart).

In summary, the hepatic venous waveform is normally phasic and predominantly antegrade.

Causes of Pulsatile Hepatic Venous Waveform

Tricuspid regurgitation

Decreased or reversed S wave

Tall a and v waves

Right-sided CHF

Maintained S wave/D wave relationship

Tall a and v waves

(a) Tricuspid regurgitation. Spectral Doppler image clearly depicts increased pulsatility (ie, wide variation between peaks and troughs). Careful observation shows a pattern that is specific for tricuspid regurgitation. The v wave is very tall, and the S wave is not as deep as the D wave. The latter finding may also be referred to as the “decreased S wave” and is specific for tricuspid regurgitation. When tricuspid regurgitation becomes severe, the S wave will no longer dip below the baseline, and there will be one large retrograde a-S-vcomplex, or “reversed S wave”; when this occurs, the D wave is the only manifestation of antegrade flow. (b) Reversed S wave. Spectral Doppler image shows a pulsatile waveform with a reversed S wave.

Tricuspid regurgitation. Spectral Doppler image clearly depicts increased pulsatility (ie, wide variation between peaks and troughs). Careful observation shows a pattern that is specific for tricuspid regurgitation. The v wave is very tall, and the S wave is not as deep as the D wave. The latter finding may also be referred to as the “decreased S wave” and is specific for tricuspid regurgitation. When tricuspid regurgitation becomes severe, the S wave will no longer dip below the baseline, and there will be one large retrograde a-S-vcomplex, or “reversed S wave”; when this occurs, the D wave is the only manifestation of antegrade flow. (b) Reversed S wave. Spectral Doppler image shows a pulsatile waveform with a reversed S wave.

Right-sided CHF without tricuspid regurgitation. Spectral Doppler image clearly shows increased pulsatility. Careful observation shows a pattern that is specific to right-sided CHF without tricuspid regurgitation. The a wave is very tall, and the normal relationship between the S and D waves is maintained (S [systole] is deeper than D[diastole]).

Causes of Decreased Hepatic Venous Phasicity

Cirrhosis

Hepatic vein thrombosis (Budd-Chiari syndrome)

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease

Hepatic venous outflow obstruction from any cause

Overall, hepatic vein thrombosis is much less common than portal vein thrombosis. Malignant

hepatic vein thrombosis (ie, tumor thrombus) is usually the result of direct invasion from an adjacent parenchymal hepatocellular carcinoma; however, any other malignant vena cava thrombosis, such as renal cell carcinoma, adrenal cortical carcinoma, or primary inferior vena cava (IVC) leiomyosarcoma, may also cause Budd-Chiari syndrome. Similar to portal vein thrombosis, both benign and malignant hepatic vein thrombosis may manifest at gray-scale US as an echogenic intraluminal filling defect. In addition, like portal vein thrombosis, tumor thrombus classically enlarges the involved hepatic vein; however, acute bland thrombus can also cause this enlargement. Therefore, vein enlargement is not a reliable discriminating feature.

Decreased hepatic venous phasicity. Diagrams illustrate varying degrees of severity of decreased phasicity in the hepatic vein. Farrant and Meire (5) first described a subjective scale for quantifying abnormally decreased phasicity in the hepatic veins, a finding that is most commonly seen in cirrhosis. The key to understanding this scale lies in observing the position of the a wave relative to the baseline and peak negative S wave excursion. As the distance between the a wave and peak negative excursion decreases, phasicity is more severely decreased.

Portal Veins

In terms of complexity, the portal venous waveform is somewhere between those of the hepatic artery and hepatic veins. A model for understanding portal venous flow requires accepting two pieces of information. First, physiologic flow should always be antegrade, which is toward the transducer and therefore creates a waveform that is above the baseline. Second, hepatic venous pulsatility is partially transmitted to the portal veins through the hepatic sinusoids, which accounts for the cardiac variability seen in this waveform. It should also be kept in mind that the flow velocity in this vessel is relatively low (16–40 cm/sec) compared with that in the vessel coursing next to it, namely, the hepatic artery.

Normal portal venous flow direction and waveform. Drawing at top illustrates that the direction of flow in normal portal veins is antegrade, or hepatopetal, which corresponds to a waveform above the baseline at spectral Doppler US. Normal phasicity may range from low (bottom left) to high (bottom right). Abnormally low phasicity results in a nonphasic waveform, whereas abnormally high phasicity results in a pulsatile waveform. The PI is used to quantify pulsatility. Normal phasicity results in a PI greater than 0.5.

The normal portal venous waveform should gently undulate and always remain above the baseline. The peak portal velocity (V1) corresponds to systole, and the trough velocity (V2) corresponds to end diastole. . Atrial contraction, toward end diastole, transmits back pressure, first through the hepatic veins, then to the hepatic sinusoids, and ultimately to the portal circulation, where forward portal venous flow (velocity) is consequently decreased (the trough).

In summary, the portal venous waveform is normally antegrade and phasic.

Normal and abnormal portal venous phasicity. Images show a spectrum of increasing pulsatility (bottom to top). Note that increasing pulsatility corresponds to a decrease in the calculated PI. Although normal phasicity ranges widely in the portal veins, the PI should be greater than 0.5 (middle and bottom). When the PI is less than 0.5 (top), the waveform may be called pulsatile; this is an abnormal finding.

Spectral Doppler US image shows a pulsatile waveform with flow reversal in the right portal vein. The waveform may be systematically characterized as predominantly antegrade, pulsatile, biphasic-bidirectional, and di-inflectional.

Slow portal venous flow. Spectral Doppler US image shows slow flow in the main portal vein. Slow portal venous flow is a consequence of portal hypertension. In this case, the peak velocity is 9.0 cm/sec, which is well below the lower limit of normal (16–40 cm/sec). Although portal hypertension may cause a pulsatile-appearing waveform as seen in this case, the slow flow helps differentiate this condition from hyperpulsatile high-velocity states such as CHF and tricuspid regurgitation.

Hepatofugal portal venous flow. Spectral Doppler US image shows retrograde (hepatofugal) flow in the main portal vein, a finding that appears blue on the color Doppler US image and is displayed below the baseline on the spectral waveform. Hepatofugal flow is due to severe portal hypertension from any cause.

Causes of Pulsatile Portal Venous Waveform

Tricuspid regurgitation

Right-sided CHF

Cirrhosis with vascular arterioportal shunting

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia–arteriovenous fistulas

Findings that are Diagnostic for Portal Hypertension

Low portal venous velocity (<16 cm/sec)

Hepatofugal portal venous flow

Portosystemic shunts (including a recanalized umbilical vein)

Dilated portal vein

Causes of absent Portal Venous Flow

Stagnant flow (severe portal hypertension)

Portal vein thrombosis (bland thrombus)

Tumor invasion

Portal vein thrombosis (acute bland thrombus). On a spectral Doppler US image, the interrogation zone shows no color flow in the main portal vein. The spectral waveform is aphasic, which indicates absence of flow. An aphasic waveform may be produced by either obstructive or nonobstructive disease.

Portal vein thrombosis (malignant tumor thrombus). On a spectral Doppler US image, the color Doppler image shows echogenic material in a distended main portal vein without color flow. Tumor thrombus tends to enlarge veins; however, acute thrombus may do this as well. The spectral waveform is pulsatile, a finding that is abnormal in the portal vein. In fact, the pulsatility of this waveform resembles that seen in arteries; hence the term arterialization (of the portal venous waveform). This finding is specific for malignant tumor thrombus.

TIPS anatomy. Drawings at top illustrate the most common positions of a TIPS relative to the native vascular anatomy. Color Doppler US image at bottom shows the appearance of a TIPS. Note that the shunt is best seen in the long view, and that normal flow starts toward the transducer (red, above the baseline) in the caudal portion of the shunt and then moves away from the transducer (blue, below the baseline) in the cephalic part. HV = hepatic vein.

TIPS flow pattern. Drawing at top illustrates the expected flow pattern within a TIPS and the surrounding vessels when the TIPS is in the most common position. Note that any segment of the portal vein between the caudal portion of the TIPS and the portal bifurcation will have hepatopetal flow. Diagrams at bottom illustrate the appearance of normal flow in the cephalic (left) and caudal (right) parts of the TIPS.

TIPS are most commonly used for the treatment of severe portal hypertension with refractory variceal bleeding or ascites. Other indications include hepatorenal syndrome, hepatic hydrothorax, and hepatic vein occlusion (Budd-Chiari syndrome). Doppler US has a long track record of reliably helping detect TIPS malfunction.

Signs of tIPS Malfunction

Direct evidence

Shunt velocity <90 cm/sec or ≥190 cm/sec

Temporal increase or decrease in shunt velocity >50 cm/sec

Indirect evidence

Main portal venous velocity <30 cm/sec

Collateral vessels (recurrent, new, or increased)

Ascites (recurrent, new, or increased)

Right-left portal venous flow reversal (ie, hepatofugal to hepatopetal)

FOR A MORE DETAILED REVIEW OF THE TOPIC PLEASE VISIT THE SITE OF THE MAIN ARTICLE, THE LINK IS IN THE LINKS SECTION OF THIS PAGE.

THIS PAGE IS INTENDED TO BE A SUMMERY OF THE ORIGIONAL ARTICLE PUBLISHED IN THE RADIOGRAPHICS MAGAZINE.

SOURCE:

http://radiographics.rsna.org/content/31/1/161.full.pdf

http://radiographics.rsna.org/content/31/1/161.figures-only

LINKS:

http://giyabradiology.blogspot.com/2011/05/portal-vein-inferior-vena-cava.html

http://giyabradiology.blogspot.com/2011/05/fatty-liver.html

http://radiographics.rsna.org/content/29/7/2081.full.pdf

http://radiographics.rsna.org/content/24/2/497.full.pdf

http://radiographics.rsna.org/content/23/5/1315.full.pdf